London banking law firm Crefovi published this interview in the special Banking supplement of the International Financial Law Review (IFLR) in 2003 (IFLR banking yearbook).
This article summarises the state of banking and finance regulations that apply to financial services companies and banks in France, in 2003.
What legislation governs authorisation and regulation of banking activities in France? What has been the most significant regulatory issue in your jurisdiction?
Banking transactions, defined by Article L 311-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code (the Code) comprise the receipt of funds from the public, credit operations and making available to customers or managing means of payment. Pursuant to Article L 511-5 of the Code, only credit institutions shall perform banking transactions in France on a regular basis. Article L 611-1 of the Code provides that the professional body named Committee of Banking and Financial Regulations (CRBF) is entitled to issue new regulations applicable to all credit institutions.
Investment services, defined by Article L 321-1 of the Code, comprise reception and transmission of orders on behalf of investors, execution of orders on behalf of investors, dealing for one’s own account, portfolio management, firm-commitment underwriting or standby underwriting, placing. Pursuant to Article 531-10 of the Code, only investment firms and credit institutions authorized to carry out investment services (so-called investment service providers) shall provide investment services in France on a regular basis. Pursuant to Article L 622-7 of the Code, the general regulations of the Conseil des Marchés Financiers (CMF) apply to all investment service providers, including credit institutions authorized to provide investment services as related services. Moreover, pursuant to Article L 621-6 of the Code, the rulings of the Commission des Opérations de Bourse (Cob) also apply to investment service providers.
The most recent significant regulatory issue in France has been the draft bill on financial security (Draft Bill), discussed before the Parliament since March 2003. The main interests of the Draft Bill consist of the merger plans between the Cob and the CMF, in order to create a new entity named Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) or Financial Markets Authority. The AMF is directed by a group (Collcge) that largely represents the market. This Draft Bill also provides specific rules on solicitation regarding banking and financial transactions.
What are the key activities for which authorisation is required?
The conduct of banking activity or the provision of investment services on French territory (as defined above) are subject to a prior authorization from the Credit Institutions and Investment Firms Committee (Cecei), an organization responsible for granting business authorization to credit institutions and investment firms in France.
As far as the provision of investment services (except portfolio management) is concerned, the Cecei shall give a copy of the application file to the Conseil des Marchés Financiers. As far as portfolio management activities are concerned, the Cecei shall give a copy of the application file to the Cob, the regulatory authority responsible for authorization and supervision of both French and foreign collective investment schemes in France. However, if this latter activity is to be carried out on an exclusive basis, the Cob will be the only supervisory authority.
What sanctions are available to the regulators in France when taking action against regulated bodies?
Pursuant to Article L 621-15 of the Code and to repress anti-competitive behavior on the financial markets, the Cob can either fine for a maximum amount of €1.5 million ($1.75 million) or when some profits have been realized, give a pecuniary sanction that cannot be more than 10 times the amount of those profits, any person who has unfairly influenced the functioning of the market. The decision of sanction may also be published on certain newspapers and publications selected by the Cob. Pursuant to Article L 532-10 of the Code, the Cob may also sanction portfolio management companies by withdrawing their licence.
Does the regulatory regime for banking business in your jurisdiction include regulatory conduct of business rules governing the obligations of a bank to its customers?
Pursuant to Article L 613-1 of the Code, the Banking Commission controls the compliance of credit institutions with conduct of business rules. Those rules are not defined in any text, but result from recommendations of the French Association of credit institutions or from master agreements.
Article L 533-4 of the Code implements into French law Article 11 of the Investment Service Directive of May 10 1993, relating to conduct of business rules for investment service providers. Notably, this article from the Code provides that investment service providers shall “check the financial situation of their clients, as well as their experience in investment matters and their objectives as far as the requested investment services are concerned”. Conduct of business rules for investment service providers are issued by the Conseil des Marchés Financiers (Title III of its General Regulations) and apply to all investment service providers except those offering portfolio management services on behalf of a third party. Portfolio management companies shall comply with Cob Ruling number 96-03 relating to conduct of business rules applicable to portfolio management services on behalf of a third party.
Moreover, Article L 562-2 of the Code provides that all credit institutions and investment firms must be vigilant and declare to Tracfin, the organization in charge of anti-money laundering controls, any sum written in their books that could emanate from drug trafficking or criminal activities, any transaction that could be linked to such traffic or activities and any transaction in which the principal’s or beneficiary’s identity is unclear.
Does the regulatory regime for banking business in your jurisdiction include regulatory capital requirements? If so, are these based on the Basel Accord and are there significant variations from the core Basel recommendations?
What effect will Basel II have on banking transactions in your jurisdiction? Are financial institutions already taking account of its effect?
The new Basel reform, which sets up a model of internal control that checks that own funds of banks relate to credit risks and operational risks through the Mc Donough ratio, favours the transfer of risks outside the banking system (for example, it favours securitization outside the banking system which is detrimental to interbanking securitization) and may constitute a substantial advantage for banks that finance retail customers. In effect, while the default probabilities are equivalent to those of institutional customers, the requirements in own funds are significantly lower for retail customers than for companies, sometimes by as much as half. French retail customers being, in average, less indebted than other retail customers from certain other developed countries and particularly than American retail customers, French bankers think that it is essentially American banks which could take a competitive advantage from the Basel reform. The same applies for revolving credit, which is the favourite way to obtain consumer credit in the US and which is treated in a very favourable way in the Basel II agreement, while it represents 7.4% of the American GDP and only 1% of Euroland’s GDP.
Does the regime in your jurisdiction include rules and operational and organisational requirements relating to internal controls and operational risk?
Pursuant to Regulation number 2001-01 of the CRBF dated June 26 2001, credit institutions and investment firms (not including those providing portfolio management services) shall have an adequate internal control system and operational risk’s measures. When the Cecei examines an application for licensing one of the above-mentioned entities, it checks whether the investment firm or credit institution is efficiently organized, notably as far as internal control and protection against operational risk are concerned.
Pursuant to Article 10 of Cob Ruling number 96-02 dated December 24 1966, investment firms that have portfolio management activities must also set up an internal control procedure. The Cob checks whether the management company has an efficient internal control system before giving a licence to provide portfolio management services in France.
Do you believe that Sarbanes-Oxley will have a material impact in your jurisdiction?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of January 23 2002 (the Act) should not have any direct impact in France. However, the French regulators share the same priorities with the American regulators, and the Cob has therefore published in August 2002 a professional guide to the attention of managers of listed companies. This vade-mecum reminds managers of their professional obligations and ethics (for example, personal obligations to declare the transactions undergone by managers on the securities of their company and obligations to keep shares under the registered securities form or in deposit), while running the company.
The Draft Bill is also being influenced by the Act, since the Parliament has inserted some new provisions on research analysts and their ability to manage conflicts of interests, and since the Draft Bill also provides for new rules setting up auditor’s independence (for example, splitting up auditing and advising activities).
Does the regime in your jurisdiction include a requirement for controllers and major shareholders of regulated banking institutions to be approved by the supervisory authorities?
Internal controllers do not have to be approved by the French supervisory authorities, but, pursuant to Regulation number 97-02 of February 21 1997 relating to internal control of credit institutions and investment firms, the regulated entities must select a person responsible for the coherence and efficiency of internal control, and inform either the Banking Commission, or the Cob or the Conseil des Marchés Financiers of their choice.
Have there been any recent significant changes to insolvency legislation in your jurisdiction, or are any such changes proposed? Have they made or will they make the regime more or less borrower friendly?
Does your jurisdiction operate a deposit protection or guarantee scheme protecting retail depositors from loss in the event of the insolvency of an authorised bank?
Does your jurisdiction have an ombudsman scheme, arbitration scheme or similar scheme for the resolution of disputes between a bank and its retail customers other than through formal legal proceedings?
Federation shall provide an ombudsman to the retail customer who files a claim. The mission of this mediator is to recommend a solution to both parties (the bank and the retail customer) and therefore answer to the query of the retail customer who has solicited him within two months. The recommended solution does not have to be followed by both parties who could prefer going to court. The mediator also reports its activity to the governor of the Bank of France annually.
Author: Annabelle Gauberti, founding partner of London banking law firm Crefovi.View Article
-- Download as PDF --